Nuclear scientists : The losers of the nuclear research

By the end of 1996 I met an old scientist who promised me his help to pursue my research about alchemy. He proposed me to transmit my book published in 1995 to his friend Louis Leprince Ringuet. Three weeks later he told me the opinion of Louis Leprince Ringuet, and unfortunately he became more distant with that sulfurous alchemy research .
   As a matter of fact physicists have tried to understand alchemy all along the XX th century, but their small mind full of a dogmatic knowledge of Atom based on false concepts of Atom behavior in nature extended to infinity the frontiers of human stupidity and prevented them to clearly understand the rational part of the alchemy knowledge. Alchemy treatises are easily understood if you are a good chemist (each one understands differently the level value of good), but not of these chemists who cannot do their job without a computer and a lot of sophisticated equipments, but of these chemists who are able to dominate the matter... it means you used to work in a lab and not the ass in a chair like European technocrats .

     My scientific contribution to the resolution of the problem of alchemy is not only based on the analysis and understanding of alchemy texts, but also on the research of acceptable correlations with known nuclear process. This contribution includes ( a non exhaustive list ) : :
  

The identification of raw materials used by the few true alchemists who succeeded.

  

The correlation between the Philosopher(s Stone and the fluoride of the last Superheavy element I name Trinitium (Tn).

  

The mechanism of formation defined using energy conditions :

A multistep nuclear reactions

  

A synergy of nuclear reactions endoenergetical and exoenergetical *

The chemistry of the alchemy process

  

The experimental verification that it exists a very strong nuclear reactivity when the alchemy mixture is treated properly

  

The identification of gamma energy peaks of the synthesis process ( RX ) and the disintegration of superheavy nuclei.

  

Starting in 1984 results of this research have been sent to some nuclear research laboratories in order to test the reactions of the scientific community regarding alchemy and to know the height of the psychological barriers of nuclear scientists . :

This first opuscule in English has been mainly sent to USA research centers. The goal was to find a laboratory interested by the research and to get a job. It resulted nothing, so I had to do this research alone : a very big work since I had to learn about all the fields required to solve correctly the problem of alchemy without interference of existing alchemy research groups.

  In 1986, following a first experiment that shew a very intense gamma activity of the alchemy medium, I sent the graphs to G.T. Seaborg (I saw him in 1983 in Seattle) and published few weeks later a small paper entitled Gold Stone Z = 126. The reactions of french scientists have been very violent : it is pseudo-science (may be nuclear scientists are doing science ? I do not think , because their concept of atom now proves to be a stinking super-bullshit. What they name pseudo-science really works since it conduces to the concrete nuclear synthesis of superheavy elements)

  I also informed Keller from Oak Ridge (he was supposed to manage the international research about superheavy elements) about that surprising observation and later sent him two minute samples of the alchemy mixture at the end of this first experiment.

  In 1988, for fun but also to know more about the nuclear reactivity of the alchemy mixture , I computed the criticity parameter of a mixture of uranium in a chemical medium. : Réactivité nucléaire d'un système chimique à source de neutrons centrale
, then one month after in order to know more about the paranoïa of french I wrote :
Paramètres d'explosion d'un système nucléaire naturel à source de neutrons centrale.
I got quickly an answer :

  Back in France in May 1989, I searched how to keep on doing this research. I worked a few months then I got enough money to buy a nuclear analyzer, an alpha spectrometer, a vacum pump, photomultiplier, silicium alpha detectors,... the good tools to know more about the alchemy nuclear reactivity .

   Quickly the solution of the alchemy problem became more and more evident : the biggest difficulty has been to throw away all the shit put by nuclear scientists on the behavior of atom in natural conditions. In 1991, I sent to the french Academy of Sciences a short paper about the possible mechanism of formation of the Philosopher's Stone supposed to be a fluoride of superheavy element ( I know enough about chemical element to say that no known element is able to do what does the Philosopher's Stone). I introduced the concept of Multistep nuclear reactions : the unique solution to explain the feasibility of the creation of superheavy elements in a chemical medium. Ten months later I received the following letter :

  Something was wrong with that anonymous answer : in place of two months to reject my paper, it took 10 months. It often happens that readers of scientific papers steal your work to get later the credit of the discovery, especially when you are an unknown searcher (You understand now why I send papers since 1984, knowing that alchemy was considerated as a chimera). Below is the mechanisl of nuclear fusion I sent to the Academy : the concept of synergy is clearly described.
  In fact I knew that I had discovered the key of the alchemy nuclear process : a Synergy of nuclear reactions and that whith that evident and natural concept it was now possible to explain all the genesis of elements on Earth crust (for the less).

   I tried Nature in order to have a new point of view.

  On April 1st of 1995 I finally succeeded to publish my book, ( it took me two years to find an editor). The first book in the world that proposes to consider alchemy as a scientif problem with an evident solution. It is a big kick in the ass to all close mind nuclear scientists and those mad people who use alchemy as the support of their fantasms.

  In June 1995 I started a new experiment. By the end of September 1995 I got an internet connexion (at that time it was a pleasure to surf on the Net) and knew a lot about people working on cold fusion.

  

In September 1996 , at the seminar about Cold Fusion at College Station (Texas - USA ), I offer to the boss of Jet Technology (Boston) my book about the rational understanding of alchemy because he told me before that he knows people from the MIT . Around two years later I found on the Net the following information :

The International Workshop on Multistep nuclear reactions was held in Trento from July 27th until July 31st, 1998 Organizers: A. Kerman, M. Chadwick.
There were 29 participating scientists and representatives of various institutions.

Ask for information at ECT : http://www.ect.unitn.it
It means you could ask for the final report or find in the directory of ECT members the e-mail of A. Kerman , a nuclear physicist from MIT who probably aggrees with the physics of the process of synergy like the European physicist, Constantin C., who visited me in Paris and told me that all was correct except the computed cross-section of the process.
  

Strange !! a French who disregarded my paper in 1992 saying that the nuclear process is too complex and a guy from MIT now who organizes a workshop about the process I proposed to explain the reality of facts... It is too much. Below is the English preface of my book that emphasizes the peculiar but natural process of synthesis of Superheavy element via the alchemy work : a synergy of nuclear reactions :

The formation of super heavy elements is necessarily possible in one fusion step according a synergy between endothermic and exothermic nuclear reactions. The very important theoretical result is that it could be quite possible to produce a macroscopic amount of superheavy nuclei from one fission of uranium (ideal case).

  The goal of this physics is to demonstrate that enough energy may be available to produce nuclear fusions conducing to superheavy elements.

  Since 2002 the research is classified    TOP  SECRET.It means that a few scientists have now enough data to consider differently the historical problem of alchemy and to evaluate other works about alchemy. Experience taught me that I have absolutely nothing to get from cleaning the shoes of those who fail to rationalize the alchemy problem. That makes the difference with that kind of scientists is that before saying alchemy is a chimera, I dedicated some time to analyze objectively the subject and to decide if it exists behind alchemy a true scientific problem.

Any progress in nuclear science must involve the true concept of synergy of nuclear reactions (It is the life of the mineral realm) I found to explain the reality of the alchemy process described in old treatises. During years I tried to catch your interest proposing you to solve the alchemy problem : you refused, so I learnt enough physics of nuclear reactions to understand what could be and how could be created the so called Philosopher's Stone of alchemists. It resulted a rational explaination of alchemy corroborated by experiments and very strong correlations with old alchemy treatises... I did it with the help of the Holly Trinity ... Nuclear physicists didn't,   therefore I name the new element Trinitium ( Tn ) and demonstrated the fraud of nuclear scientists.

   This name has never been invented by a scientist from the well known French CEA (Centre d'Epanouissement des Abrutis), as someone tried to convince me. The name existed in 1935 since it is explained in the Quillet Encyclopedia as the action of different factors to produce something (in the the field of physiology).